Design a site like this with
Get started

Peacetime Blues: Tough Livin’ in Post-Victory Russia

It goes without saying that winning a war takes sacrifice, but that sacrifice often causes ripple effects as the years after the war go by. Aside from how the Soviets may have benefited from their eventual victory, they endured major negative consequences from WWII across many aspects of their society. Specifically, the practical costs to their infrastructure, economy, and society in general counterbalanced the abstract “prestige” that Russia obtained from the war (Freeze, p. 392). While WWII may have given the Soviet Union a new sense of geopolitical superiority, it gave the Soviet people unemployment, homelessness, and famine.

For veterans especially, the benefits of a Soviet victory were often hard to see; as they experienced rampant unemployment, insecure housing, and lack of health services (Veterans Return, 1947). With an agricultural system severely damaged from the war, it’s easy to see the coordination between rising unemployment and decreasing food security (Famine of 1946-1947, 1947). It’s also easy to see how the lack of care for veterans would only compound the problems they might have with poverty and homelessness. The lack of mental health especially put Russian veterans in a baseline difficult position, even if they were still physically able bodied and could avoid the “shortage of prosthetic devices” (Veterans Return, 1947).

While there were certainly outside factors contributing to economic struggles and food insecurity, the Soviet Union’s post-war policies didn’t provide much relief for vast proportions of its people. With the restricting of private plot use and raising of taxes on their profits, the government “squeezed” the rural populace for the purpose of reconstruction (Freeze, p. 393).

While Russia may have benefitted in some ways from its victory in WWII, the sense of “victory” was likely hard to feel for many ordinary Russians. Given the perfect storm of damaged infrastructure, outside factors, and questionable post-war policies, it’s not surprising to see how the abstract benefits of victory often failed to trickle down to practical benefits for the Russian people.

Freeze, Gregory, L. Russia, A History. Oxford University Press. Oxford, New York. 2009.


4 thoughts on “Peacetime Blues: Tough Livin’ in Post-Victory Russia

  1. Sam, you’ve tackled the complicated legacy of “victory” in World War II really well here! It’s easy to think that victory in the war would have done similar things for the Soviet economy as it did for the United States, but the reality is quite different, and you’ve done a great job explaining the reasons behind that.


  2. It is sad to imagine how hard life must have been for Russians after the war, especially because of the lack of mental health care and prosthetic devices to help soldiers recover! Great job with your post, it was very informative.


  3. This was a really good post about how WWII affected the Soviets and especially the veterans. How do you think the people felt about the treatment of veterans and just the crumbling of the society?


  4. You’ve got some good comments and questions here, so I’ll just add that I think it’s important to remember that overcoming the “peacetime blues” was going to be a huge challenge. The war had been fought on Soviet territory and at great expense for four years. Rebuilding was going to take time and involve (even more) sacrifice. Also, check out Sabrina’s post on veterans, which poses some of the same questions raised here:


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this:
search previous next tag category expand menu location phone mail time cart zoom edit close